In the wake of every mass shooting, a consistent narrative is pushed by fake news outlets, declaring that the incident was orchestrated by a “lone shooter” with a “long gun.” Despite any evidence to the contrary, this storyline remains unchanged from day one. Moreover, both the FBI and CIA are unable to provide security footage for these events, raising questions about their competency in handling such incidents.
Take, for example, the case of Thomas Matthew Crooks, who allegedly attempted to assassinate former President Donald Trump using drones, multiple ladders, encrypted cell phones, and a homemade IED with a detonator. If Crooks was working alone, why did he possess such advanced equipment, and how did he acquire an explosive device without conducting any research on its construction.
It is also worth questioning the lack of security measures employed during Trump’s speech. Why didn’t the Secret Service deploy their own drones to monitor the fairgrounds? This oversight would have revealed the presence of the “lone shooter” and his drone before the attack occurred, providing undeniable proof that this event was not staged by those in close proximity to Trump.
The possibility of a deep state conspiracy cannot be dismissed, as there is increasing evidence suggesting that Crooks did not work alone but rather acted as a patsy for those involved in the assassination plot. If Crooks was incapable of constructing an IED, as the FBI claims, then how did he come to possess one? Additionally, why didn’t Crooks rig his drone to detonate the explosive device over Trump, ensuring the completion of his “job.
The Secret Service’s negligence in securing the area where the assassination attempt occurred raises further suspicions. Why were there no security cameras present before or during the event? And why did the Secret Service refuse to stand on a slightly sloped roof, while other groups of security officials had no issue performing this task on an even more slanted rooftop.
The FBI’s reluctance to release information under the Freedom of Information Act only serves to fuel conspiracy theories. Shouldn’t every employee involved in Trump’s security detail be held accountable for their alleged involvement in a plot to assassinate him.
A significant clue that this assassination attempt was orchestrated by the deep state lies in the fact that Director of the Secret Service, Kimberly Cheatle, claims her anti-sniper snipers were not stationed on the roof due to safety concerns. However, a cursory glance at the roof reveals that it is barely sloped at all, casting doubt on the sincerity of this explanation.
Another red flag is the speculative investments placed against Trump’s assets and Rumble by those who stood to gain billions of dollars if his stocks plummeted as a result of his death. These dubious financial transactions suggest that some individuals may have had inside knowledge of the assassination plot.
To stay informed about the latest developments in this story, be sure to tune your apocalypse dial to Preparedness.news for updates on real news and insights into the deep state’s machinations.